In USA Today a globalist, one Eric Finkelstein, says, “a major public health intervention” is necessary to prevent the worst for a fattening public.
At the end of the article some bullet points are listed for what is considered successful weight control (the basis for a major public health intervention, no doubt):
How can you lose weight and keep it off for good?
Successful dieters in the National Weight Control Registry, a group of 10,000 people who have lost 30 pounds or more and maintained that loss for a year or more, have developed many weight-control strategies. For instance, they:
•Follow a low-calorie, low-fat diet of about 1,800 calories a day.
•Keep track of food intake.
•Count calories, carbs or fat grams or use a commercial weight-loss program to track food intake.
•Walk about an hour a day or burn the same calories doing other physical activities.
•Eat breakfast regularly, often including whole grains and low-fat dairy products.
•Limit dining out to an average of three times a week, and fast food to less than once a week.
•Eat similar foods often and don’t splurge much.
•Watch fewer than 10 hours of TV a week.
•Weigh themselves at least once a week.
I’d file this garbage bag full of conventional thought under the following title:
The public is fat. Let’s keep them fat and make them completely miserable as well.
People really expect someone, some expert, some technocrat to save them. But weight control is really quite simple: eat natural food. Not processed food labeled “natural, ” dummy. Natural food that you have to prepare. Natural food that doesn’t come in a package or wrapper or bottle.
On second thought, austerity is the globalist watchword, why not caloric austerity as part of a major public health intervention for the masses as well?
No one enjoys serfdom, or do they to avoid personal responsibility?







Recent Comments